Recent Comments
that this can't hurt our chances with derrick green. true << clemson may lead for him but their offensive schemes (spread mainly) don't equate to nfl schemes nearly as well as vt's do (i don't think they do anyway). with harris prepping, that spreads the depth out a little bit and it would be awesome to see a drew harris/derrick green tandem in future seasons. fwiw - i hope that edmunds goes to the defensive side of the ball. unless he is A LOT better than holmes, he better helps the team on that side of the ball.
No offense, but that argument doesn't make any sense to me. People keep trying to label it the "Penn State scandal" but it is really the "Jerry Sandusky and a few administrators scandal." I just don't see why the NCAA should be involved at all. We will now never know what Joe Paterno knew, if anything. Fair or not JoePa's legacy has been tarnished, but the NCAA should not attempt to punish Penn State in any way.
Marshall Wood and Montrezl Harrell were both looking to go elsewhere around the time of the Greenberg firing.
Wood was talked into staying.
Harrell decided to go to Louisville.



I thought Marshall Wood was going somewhere else. Or wanted to or something, did that not happen? I'm out of the loop on this one.
I felt like there was gonna be a logjam at tailback anyways so maybe this isnt the worst thing. He's just gotta focus up and handle his business, he'll be hearing the crowd roar in Lane before he knows it.




is potentially not red-shirting Trey or in the very least giving him more of a look at RB before a permanent move to LB.
Also, I really want to see what Tony Gregory can get done finally.
While the Sandusky fiasco is horrendous and it is very difficult to believe that Paterno did not know and could not have done much more, the NCAA has no jurisdiction to levy ANY sanctions (let alone the death penalty) because the matter did not involve the football team or program, which is why there are no NCAA rules that govern same. The NCAA was designed to deal with fairness in collegiate athletics, which is not even of concern in the Sandusky case.


If the jersey ends up looking like that I might cry.
By your definition it is a successful year. It just seems to be the same story year after year.
If you look at the Rivals list for Alabama you see that probably 80% of the top twenty are going to either Auburn or Alabama. That to me says there is shame in going out of state. Right now there is no shame for Virginia players to go out of state. Maybe it is just demographics, in that Virginia has a more transient population.
I will know we have arrived as a super power in football when most of the top players stay in state and feel ashamed to go elsewhere.
about that hat is A 'Neer fan doesnt know how to spell their mascot's name and remain unphased while a UVA fan has so little spirit they wouldn't recognize the different LOLogo
Combines two of the best into one great hat.
that it's a combination of a few things ... first of all, virginia is pretty talent-loaded, relative to most states but there are only 1 1/2 d1 football programs. we only have so many spots per year, this being a smaller year. and you have to look at each prospect individually regarding virginia tech.
- burns and hackenberg never got an offer from us -- they're not our type of back and we got the one we wanted (hodges)
- allen lived in alabama for the brunt of his life and is a childhood tide fan -- it was always a long shot with him
- levenberry NEVER had ANY interest in either of the in-state schools. he was michigan or fsu pretty much from the get-go
- mizzell -- bayside hs = uva pipeline .. with vt's rb depth, he is a long shot
- derrick green -- we're in it but with our rb depth, a probably #2 or #3 for him right now (behind clemson and osu)
- matt rolin may have a brother who walked on at vt .. but he is a lifelong, gamecock legacy (i think his dad and grandfather both went there) .. everyone else was a long shot
- wyatt teller with either be a hokie or hoo
- doug randolph committed to stanford early .. obviously getting a TOP NOTCH education was big on his list and he likely reached out to him. neither uva or vt had a chance (though some hoos still seem to believe that he may be swayed to uva)
we ended up with the qbs (yes..that's plural) that we wanted, the top two OL in the state, will likely end up with the best cb in the country (and possibly the #1 recruit in the country in the end). we'll end up with a SMALL class and still end up with a top 25 class most likely. not sure what you really expect. vt is branching out and recruiting in more states now. i'd say that, because of the in-state talent that we have combined with the lack of legit d1 schools, that the ratio is lower than most states.
If more than 25% of the top 20 players and about 50% of the top 10 go out of state what does it say about college football in the Commonwealth? Is this a typical statistic for most states? How many should be staying in-state? What is considered successful in-state recruiting?

Helmet = Awesome
Jersey = Bad (in a sketch, may look better in person. If we're only going to change the numbers, then why put them on the old 2007-2008 jerseys?)
Hats = the worst ever. Honestly, why even bother...just take donations.

for the rest of us.

but this guy takes some pretty awesome pictures. http://www.ivanmorozov.com/







wonder if the one on the right will be for our pro combats this year. . .