Recent Comments

I hope that's true, but the fact that when he came in he went after shorter receivers has me doubting that. Especially when the guys he went after weren't "easy" to pick up late in the year guys. They were guys like Latrell Williams (5'11, Tennessee commit), Nate Johnson (5'11", Michigan commit), Velus Jones (5'11", USC commit), Dre Massey (6', Florida commit). That shows where his mind was

Not sure some of that is not who he could get to go to Memphis. I think he looks for playmakers at WR, but when most programs are more desirable than your school as a destination you have to compromise on something. Maybe he compromised on size instead of quickness or speed, but would have loved to get the athletes in our system now if he could have.

I'm not seeing that in what the staff has said so far. They actually want Patterson and the other incoming WR's to add some muscle from what I've heard. Fuente & Cornelson have been stressing repeatedly how they will mold the offense around the talent and that it will change from year to year. I think it's more likely the fact that at Memphis they couldn't land many guys that had the necessary skill set plus the size that would make a high-value P5 recruit. Also, Denmark has been given a lot of credit for his track-speed. I just think if the incoming WR's don't make an impact next year I don't think it will be because they are too tall or too big.

FWIW the new staff pursued Patterson hard to get him to re-commit and fought for Denmark as well when he was getting in-home visits from Muschamp.

In like what Fuente did as soon as he came in. In fact I think we might have lost only 2 kids recruited under the previous staff because of the change. And that's ok.

Considering that he knew we needed a QB, he got in a transfer and Secured Josh Jackson in the process. He just created competition at a critical spot for us.

2nd - he got Demetri moore, another need for us at OL.

2 more recruits which he managed to get here outside of transfers and then on top of that the staff was able to convince the committs who gave a verbal to the previous staff. That's pretty hard to do.

I think they will lay the groundwork and get better players.

The other aspect to our problem has been attrition since going back to about the 2010 recruiting class. Lots of dropouts, injuries, academic issues and other related losses. I'm hoping that the new staff can get guys and keep them along with developing them. There are a lot of stories with hokies of what could have been (Nick Dew, Drew Harriss, J.Stanford). Lets keep our fingers crossed.

It's pretty obvious that this ban is an attempt to satisfy the NCAA in hopes that they won't punish them anymore. They usually are. No point in punishing specific people yet. I also don't think Pitino is the only one to blame, even if he did know it was going on.

Interesting sidenote about Beamer Day:

He spoke at Imperial Plaza (a senior living community) in the evening after being at the Capitol. My father leads a bible study and the residents invited him to come see Beamer since they all know that I went to VT.

Anyway, Beamer spoke for about 15 minutes and did a brief Q&A - the question that stood out to my dad the most was when he was asked, "Who was the best player he ever coached?"

The answers might be pretty obvious, but thought it was still worth sharing. Vick was his immediate answer, saying he was super gifted and special. Followed that up by saying Tyrod was the next best player he ever coached.

I was fortunate enough to be in Blacksburg for all four years of Tyrod's career. The thing that is readily apparent from those teams to the more recent ones is that a guy like Tyrod masks a lot of weaknesses. There's currently a lot of narratives why things have taken a nosedive... well, considering the two best players Beamer says he has coached ended up as NFL starters is extremely telling.

Pages